Tribute to Candace Lee Williams

This blog is shutting down, but a new one is beginning.

I’ve been writing for well over a decade. I’ve been blogging for about three years. Unfortunately in the last eighteen months, I’ve forgotten how to do both.

I’ve tried to break out of my creative funk—and over the last two months I’ve had a modicum of success with the writing—but every time I’d think about this blog I’d see the date of my last post and get depressed. So I decided that a change of scenery would be nice.

So I’ve closed this blog (I won’t be deleting it, but there will be no more posts and I’ve closed all comments), redesigned it from top to bottom, and started this blog with a clean slate, and a promise to myself to blog t least 5 times each week.

Please take a few minutes to visit my new blog and make a note of the new address and the new RSS Feed.

This post contains new content as well as content posted on this blog on September 11, 2006 and September 11, 2007

In the days following September 11, 2001, I was one of the millions of Americans who pledged to Never Forget.

In a sense I did keep my promise. I didn’t forget the attacks, or how they affected me. And I have tried not to let their effects lead me into lingering anger or hatred.

But in a larger sense I didn’t keep my promise. Though I didn’t forget the victims, I also never took the time to know them.

2,996 is, in a sense, my self imposed penance, my Mea Culpa. Today I am one of many caring people around the world who have taken this day to remember those among us who gave our lives for doing what we all do every day…

…Live Free

The Falkenberg Family

The Falkenberg Family

Charles Falkenberg
Leslie Whittington (Falkenberg)
Zoe Falkenberg, aged 8
Dana Falkenberg, aged 3

Charles and Leslie boarded American Airlines Flight 77 with their two daughters, Zoe and Dana, en route to Canberra, Australia, for what family members said was a dream, working vacation. Leslie, who was an associate professor at Georgetown was going for a short stint as a visiting fellow at Australian National University at Canberra. She was bringing her family down under for a once-in-a-lifetime trip. They had just moved out of their home, in fact they spent their last few days before 9/11 in a hotel, and upon their return to the states, were moving into a new house in Chevy Chase.

Charles Falkenberg was a software engineer had spent six years designing software for oceanographers, ecosystem and space scientists. He had also worked with scientists researching the the long-term impact of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.

It’s difficult to write about the lives of two children who were too young to have really begun to live them. I know that both girls had taken swimming lessons at the YMCA, and that they accompanied their mother to work often enough that her coworkers had fond memories of their visits, particularly of Zoe’s flamboyant outfits.

To help cope with the grief of losing an entire family, the girl’s grandparents have asked people who wish to remember the Falkenbergs, to plant Zinnias, Zoe’s favorite flower.

Two years ago, my family and I planted zinnias under an arch of jasmine. Each year they bloom stronger, larger, and more beautiful than before…

…like they’re growing…

…like two little girls should have.

Eric Thomas Ropiteau

Life was going well for Eric, before it was cut short.

On September 10, he called his Mom to tell her the good news—he and three of his friends had just signed a lease for a large apartment in Brooklyn—he was barely able to contain his glee. Just a few months earlier he has began working at TradeSpark, a subsidiary of Cantor Fitzgerald. Just a few days earlier he has bought a bonsai tree with his girlfriend, Fabienne—they named it Herbert.

An online tribute from a college friend describes him as having an infectious energy. Over and over again he’s described a guy everyone liked.

This year I remember Eric Thomas Ropiteau.

While researching this post I found this message:

By Lara Ropiteau on Thursday, September 13, 2001 - 01:02 am:

I am looking for my brother, Eric Ropiteau. He works at tradespark/Cantor Fitzgerald on the 105th floor of Tower one. He is a 6'4" white male with black hair. He is 24 years old. Please contact me with any information. Thank you.

It’s painful to read that knowing that her plea will never be answered…at least not with good news. Also troubling is that Eric was one of the few that Project 2,996 failed in it’s first year.

Just today I received an email from his sister, asking that I be sure to include him in this year’s tribute.

Lara, I’m sorry for your loss—sorry beyond the ability of words to express.

Candace Lee Williams

Candace Lee Williams

March 5, 1981 - September 11, 2001

Learning about someone from hundreds of miles away and 1,800 days removed is a little bit like assembling a jigsaw puzzle without having the picture as a guide.

Here are just some of the pieces:

Candace was a student. A graduate of Immaculate High School of Danbury Connecticut in 1999, and attending Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts. She made the Dean’s List once, and was a member of the National Honor’s Society.

Candace was a Daughter, Sister, Granddaughter and Niece.

Candace was active. In high school she was a cheerleader, served on the student council, volunteered for the Special Olympics, played basketball and ran cross country.

Candace worked in the WTC. Though she was on Flight 11 when she died. The plane she was in crashed into the building where she worked as an intern. She impressed her co-workers at Merrill Lynch so much that on her last day they sent her away in a limousine. The next semester Merrill Lynch asked the University for “five more Candaces.”

Candace was a dreamer. On 9/11 she was on the way to California, to meet her roommate for a short vacation. On that trip she wanted, more than anything else, to have her picture taken with the Hollywood sign

Maybe more than anything Candace was a helper. As a child she helped out at her grandparent’s construction company and not just in the office. She ran the machines, she poured concrete and she even put in septic systems.

At Northeastern University she developed a reputation as someone who would help others. Classmates appeared on her doorstep before exams, knowing she’d help—she even helped convince one friend not to drop out of school.

Airline records say that on Flight 11, Candace was seated next to Mildred Naiman, an 80-year-old grandmother. Candace’s mother says she’s sure her daughter died holding Mildred’s hand, comforting her.

Candace and her brother, Corey

Candace,

I won’t insult your memory, your friends or your family by claiming that I know you. But from what they’ve all said about you, I feel I can say that you’re someone I would have liked to know. Five years later, the imprint you have left in other’s lives continues.

They will never forget you.

And five years later I make you this promise…

…I will never forget you.

Dale Challener Roe

I’ve stumbled upon a strange place for poetry. You see, in the last few months I’ve become reenamored with a hobby I’ve flirted with for several years: Heraldry. You may know it by that name, but you also may have heard it referred to as coats of arms (correct terminology) or crests (misused term).

Now if you are at all familiar with Heraldry, you may be wondering how I have found a poetic outlet in the pictures on the shields of the knights of old. Well, one of the very first things you learn about heraldry, is that it’s not a specific image that is linked to a particular person. It is, instead, the description of that image that is important.

In short, it is not a discipline of pictures, it is a discipline of words. And, as I’m learning, much to my own delight, those words can be wonderfully poetic.

Most of the common heraldic terms are not English, but (at least in most English-speaking countries, Norman French. The upshot of this, is that the text descriptions of the images I am designing, or reading about, are written in a beautifully foreign language.

Colors as simple as red, white and blue become Gules, Argent and Azure. An ordinary stripe can, depending on its placement, be called a Pale, Bend, Base, Fess or Chief. Even the directions, left and right, become more interesting when called Dexter and Sinister.

Take, for instance, the image next to my name in the sidebar. In English you might describe this as a red field with a silver lion and a gold head, under a blue strip with four ancient trumpets. Now while there would be nothing wrong with this, the correct description is much more interesting—Gules a Lion Rampant Argent its Head Or on a Chief Azure four Clarions Argent.

Taken at face value, this quirk of an ancient tradition would be nothing more than charming. However, in the midst of a particularly nasty bout of writer’s block, that stems largely from the fact that I have no more that 15-20 minutes each week to write, this quirk has become a poetic outlet.

I find myself composing new designs not for their beauty (at least not primarily), but instead for their poetry. I will discard certain symbols, because I find their name displeasing. If a description has an awkward cadence, I will rework it, or just go in a new direction.

In a sense, it’s poetry in the abstract. There is little concrete meaning to the words, and within certain limits, symbols and images can be chosen simply for their sound.

So what does this have to do with you, my reader. No, I’m not suggesting that you delve into heraldry with the intention of learning to design visual images with a kind of poetic cryptography. But each of us, particularly those of us who are apt to complain about a marked lack or writing time, can probably find small, unexpected outlets for us to eke out a tiny bit of creative writing.

When you’re short on time, look at your life and see where you might be able to squeeze in a little poetry.

This post was originally posted on Write Anything—where six writers talk about the trials and tribulations of their writing lives. And each Tuesday the soapbox belongs to me.

It’s easy to become comfortable. And the older I get, the easier it seems. In some areas of life this isn’t a bad thing. For instance when juggling the extra-curricular activities of a family of six, I have no problem steering some kids into activities I’m familiar with—especially if it means fewer destinations for my own chauffeur service.

But in writing this comfort zone can be a very bad thing. While all readers, at one time or another, look for the familiar, writing that stands out is writing that is fresh and original. Comfortable is one thing, complacency is something completely different.

So how do we as writers stop ourselves from becoming complacent on our own writing?

The easiest way is to vary your reading. Sci-fi is my favorite genre, and I could easily slip into reading only that. But more I make a point to read from as many other genres as I can.

However, the best way is to keep trying new things with your own writing. Experiment. Art, at it’s very nature is experimental. If you love to write in the 3rd person, write a few stories—or even scenes—in the first person. Try a genre you sometimes read, but never write. Try a dialogue only story.

I routinely find that if I’m stuck on one story, shaking things up by writing something new—something I never intend to polish and pursue—can get me unstuck in a hurry.

So that’s your assignment for this week. Write something in your Un-Comfort Zone.

This post was originally posted on Write Anything—where six writers talk about the trials and tribulations of their writing lives. And each Tuesday the soapbox belongs to me.

A few weeks ago I began a question and answer exchange with my ten-year old son when he asked me if we wrote letters when I was a child. Evidently the question stemmed from a class discussion where his teacher tried to convey to them that the idea of instant communication was very new.

I know from firsthand experience that today’s youth just doesn’t understand having to wait for an answer. The older two are now old enough that they’re starting to exchange phone numbers with friends—and those friends are now calling the house. I’m still one of those old-fashioned types who see no reason to dive for the phone as soon as it rings, nor do I answer every call. If, however, a missed call happens to be one of the kids friends, I know the phone will ring again—almost immediately. It seems their generation is unwilling to accept that someone they want to talk to may be out of reach even for a few minutes.

It goes without saying that this is a direct result from ubiquity of mobile phones and the accessibility of the internet. These children know nothing of going to the library to research a topic—they go directly to Wiki and have an answer within seconds. They know nothing of letting your anger at your close friend winnow away while waiting for them to return your call—instead they obsessively try each of the three phone numbers and two email addresses they have for their friend so they can speak their mind immediately.

By no means are those of us who grew up in a slower time (the 80s for instance) free from guilt on the subject. My sweetie has a cell phone, and during the day is usually close to the house phone as well. When I have a question I am often frustrated with how long it can take to reach her, even if it’s only a few short minutes until she calls me back.

But lost in all this hustle and bustle is the tragedy that we are losing the ability—or perhaps, merely the desire—to measure and consider our words before we use them.

When I was eleven or twelve, a close friend moved away. I lived in South Florida, and he moved to Houston. It was the early- to mid-80s and long distance was still expensive. Email was confined to the geek elite on the primordial internet, and that left us with…the old reliable U.S. Mail. Over the next four years we conversed by letter. Brief, childish, clunky letters at first, built over the years getting less frequent, longer, and much better in quality.

Looking back, these letters were critical, not only in helping me learn to write, but also in learning to measure my words and collect my thoughts before tackling an issue.

I’ll hazard a guess that most of you fall into the same category as me—over the years as communication has gotten more frequent, more intrusive, the level of communication in your life has plummeted.

So right now I’m throwing down the gauntlet to each of you—and myself as well. This week I want us all to write a letter. I don’t care if you sit down at your computer or with a nice pen and fancy paper. But however you choose to write the letter, you must mail it—No Email.

I don’t want to hear any complaints that you have no one to write a letter to. Write a love letter you your better half—I guarantee a letter will have a greater impact than a XOX at the bottom of an email. Take the time to tell a friend—with no LOLs or IMOs—how much you enjoy their company.

Take the time to compose a letter. Consider each sentence. Be profound if that’s the mood you’re in. Don’t ask shallow questions that are merely conversational, because this person won’t read this for at least a few days.

Savor the experience. I guarantee, it will be more difficult than you remember. But it will also be more rewarding.

This post was originally posted on Write Anything—where six writers talk about the trials and tribulations of their writing lives. And each Tuesday the soapbox belongs to me.

 
I need a laugh. So I’m bringing back an old idea. I’m asking for you to join me in defining the humor genre. Yes, I realize that Humor isn’t really a genre, but more of a sub-genre of each, but when someone needs a laugh they’re not in the mood for technicalities.

So if someone you knew asked to to recommend a funny read, what would you tell them?

Leave your recommendations in the comment section—along with your reasons—and I’ll update this list as we go.

Humor (fiction)

Perfect Skin, by Nick Earles
Various Titles, Terry Pratchett

Humor (non-fiction)

Various Titles, Bill Bryson

This post was originally posted on Write Anything—where six writers talk about the trials and tribulations of their writing lives. And each Tuesday the soapbox belongs to me.

One of the greats has died.

A scientist, an explorer, a visionary and, most famously, one of the greatest science-fiction writers of all time—Sir Arthur C. Clarke has passed away at the age of 90.

It’s difficult to overstate the effect that Arthur C. Clarke had on the modern world. He was, arguably, best example of a Renaissance Man the modern world has seen in decades, and as such his influence was felt in many diverse worlds.

He was most famous for his prolific writing career. He wrote more approximately 100 books, among them landmarks of fiction and non-fiction. And movies. He co-authored 200: A Space Odyssey—probably the single most influential and groundbreaking science-fiction movie ever. His novels often stood alone as the most optimistic of the Golden Age of Sci-Fi.

His optimism was even more evident in his most important role. Above all Arthur C. Clarke was a visionary. In the 1940s he predicted that man would reach the moon by the year 2000—an idea that was roundly dismissed by authors and scientists alike. When man left the ventured to the moon the the 1960s, he teamed with Walter Cronkite for the television broadcasts. After returning to the Earth, Neil Armstrong, he said that Clarke had “provided the essential intellectual drive that led us to the moon.” In fact it was once estimated that over 75% percent of the scientists at NASA considered Clarke a critical inspiration.

Even more impactful to our everyday lives, Clarke is the person credited with the concept of communication satellites. He presented the idea in a memo to the RAF in 1945, who rejected the idea as absurd. He tuned to the private sector, and the article was published in Wireless World in 1945. His idea led to the boom in worldwide communications that brought on the electronic revolution.

He never stopped imagining. He is also credited with the idea for he space elevator—commonly seen as the best way to get massive payloads to and from orbit—an idea NASA and other agencies are pursuing.

He was a scientist, and artist an man of vision.

And today, without him, the universe is a less brilliant place.

Sir Arthur C. Clarke — 1917 - 2008

“The only way of finding the limits of the possible is by going beyond them into the impossible.”

“I’m sure we would not have had men on the Moon if it had not been for Wells and Verne and the people who write about this and made people think about it. I’m rather proud of the fact that I know several astronauts who became astronauts through reading my books.”

“A hundred years ago, the electric telegraph made possible - indeed, inevitable - the United States of America. The communications satellite will make equally inevitable a United Nations of Earth; let us hope that the transition period will not be equally bloody.”

“The inspirational value of the space program is probably of far greater importance to education than any input of dollars… A whole generation is growing up which has been attracted to the hard disciplines of science and engineering by the romance of space.”

“It may be that the old astrologers had the truth exactly reversed, when they believed that the stars controlled the destinies of men. The time may come when men control the destinies of stars.”

“As our own species is in the process of proving, one cannot have superior science and inferior morals. The combination is unstable and self-destroying.”

“Information is not knowledge, knowledge is not wisdom, and wisdom is not foresight. Each grows out of the other, and we need them all.”

“I don’t pretend we have all the answers. But the questions are certainly worth thinking about.”

“It is not easy to see how the more extreme forms of nationalism can long survive when men have seen the Earth in its true perspective as a single small globe against the stars.”

“Perhaps, as some wit remarked, the best proof that there is Intelligent Life in Outer Space is the fact it hasn’t come here. Well, it can’t hide forever - one day we will overhear it.”

“Sometimes I think we’re alone in the universe, and sometimes I think we’re not. In either case the idea is quite staggering.”

A couple of weeks ago, I had need of an old book—a novel I had read some years back. In my collection finding a specific book is not an easy task. However, the act of searching often yields unexpected diversions. In looking for the book I came across several old notebooks.

I’ve never been one to religiously use notebooks or journals—for most of my writing life I’ve had easy access to a computer—but for the better part of twenty years I’ve usually had a notebook nearby. And over the years I’ve scribbled quite an impressive volume into them. So during my search I took the liberty of browsing through some of my old ramblings.

It’s both exhilarating and humbling to read the stories, the fragments, the scenes, written over a decade ago. Although read is a bit of an exaggeration, as my handwriting is cryptic when read immediately. It’s downright fun to read some of the ideas that flowed from my own pen in response to one prompt or another—ideas that once burned, but faded away for one reason or another.

I did find the book I wanted. And now it and a dozen old notebooks sit on the corner of my desk.

I certainly won’t want for ideas for quite a while.

This post was originally posted on Write Anything—where six writers talk about the trials and tribulations of their writing lives. And each Tuesday the soapbox belongs to me.

Next Page »